I grew up Catholic in a small town
which was unfriendly to Catholics. I don't think most people knew
why, they just didn't like Catholics. Those who knew why, all seemed
to use this vein of reasoning: the Catholic Church is evil, therefore
Catholics are evil (or stupid). The big three proofs of the Catholic
Church's corruption were:
The Crusades - proves the CC wants
world dominion over other religions (countries) by armed force if
necessary.
The Spanish Inquisition – proves
the CC approves the use of torture to obtain confessions of wrong
doing from innocent victims who have displeased the hierarchy.
Galileo - proves the CC is opposed
to scientific research and advancement.
I am not here concerned with debunking
the above statements (and they are only three of very many) but I am
here questioning the underlying and unspoken premise. This premise
being: “If I can show a problem in a part of the Church, then I can
assign that problem to the entire Church. No one seemed bothered that
these events all occurred prior to the founding of the United States!
Why not blame the French for the atrocities
Frank armies committed during the Crusades? Why not blame Spain for
the Inquisition? Why not blame rival scientists for the Galileo
affair?
I think the answer is quite simple: it
was easy. It created a “them vs us” mentality which requires
little knowledge. It is comforting to be on the right side and to
actively oppose evil.
But, I am not really writing about the
unfairness of my childhood. Especially as I am guilty of the same
thing.
Dismissing a group for preconceived
traits is becoming the norm today, maybe even the ideal. Group
identity has ever been with us but it has multiplied exponentially
with instant communication. Our world is full of divisions: glbt vs
straight, conservative vs liberal, old vs young, woman vs man,
Republican vs Democrat vs Tea Party vs Libertarian, urban elite vs
hayseed-hicks, educated vs ignorant, socialist vs capitalist, rich vs
poor, and a myriads more. All tend to use the same tactic against
opponents:
“I am intelligent, reasoned, clever
and correct. You are not because you are a part of the other
group. Should you try to provide a defense of your position, I may
blithely ignore your defense because I am intelligent, reasoned,
clever and correct and you are not because you are a member of the
other group!”.
Despising any member of the rival
group is O.K. After all, if they were reasoned, intelligent, clever
and correct then they would agree with me. If not, they are an evil
which must be suppressed. I need only find a few easily proved and
memorable examples of misdeeds of one to condemn the entire group for
all time. Nothing could be any easier!
We need to just grow up! Look at what
the other guy says; argue, debate, reason, disagree, question. By
all means do engage; do not merely dismiss. Ideas have consequences.
It may not be fun. It will not be easy. But who ever said life was
supposed to be easy.
Tim Ohmes is a Catholic Revert, father of 7, amateur apologist, catechist, a/c mechanic extraordinaire originally from a town smaller than the readership of this blog (if you count my mom).
If the naysayers are Protestant Christians (and they probably are), you can mention the witch-burnings by Luther and Calvin. Those who worship in crystal cathedrals should not throw stones...
ReplyDelete